GII. 9 April 2020
PANKAJ SHARMA
As India seeks greater influence in global
policy-making at a different level after Narendra Modi has taken over as the
Prime Minister of India, Indian Foreign Service is being reshaped. But the
experts in the areas of international diplomacy feel that six years of Modi
regime could deliver very little in strengthening the Indian diplomatic corps.
Though a number of new missions have been opened in various countries during
this period, especially in Africa, but the system seems inadequately equipped
to meet the new challenges emerged with the new global equations India has with
different power blocks.
Till about the early eighties, the Indian
Foreign Service (IFS) was perceived to be the more desirable service than the
Indian Administrative Service (IAS). Then the trend changed and IAS outshone
IFS. Foreign Service has traditionally been a relationship-management field
force, with limited lobbying or Brand India-building mandate. In the last few
years, the focus on the IFS has been higher, with international branding of
India as well as consumerisation of services.
India currently has approximately 3,000
‘diplomats’ working outside and within the country. They include around 950 A-Grade
IFS officers, nearly 300 Grade-1 IFS (B) officers, 40 of the Interpreters
Cadre, 30 of the Legal and Treaties Cadre, 635 attaches, 550 diplomatic
officers from sectorial staff, and a little more than 300 diplomatic officers
for other ministries.
Managing this ‘specially powered’ contingent
of diplomats that is so diversely posted across the world has its own challenges.
Finding trustworthy officers for sensitive stations has always been a demanding
exercise. Keeping an eye on the stealthy characters in the Foreign Service is
not an easy business. The need to check the repeat of the stories of Madhuri
Gupta, Sukhjinder Singh, Manmohan Sharma, Ravi Nair, Rabinder Singh, Ashok
Sathe, K V Unnikrishnan and many more top Indian officials has also expanded
with the changing times.
Diplomat Madhuri Gupta, arrested on
charges of spying for Pakistan. Navy officer Commodore Sukhjinder Singh was probed
for his alleged liaison with a Russian woman when he was posted in Russia as
the head of Indian team overseeing the refit of aircraft carrier Admiral
Gorshkov. A board of inquiry, set up against Singh after his objectionable
photographs with the unidentified woman surfaced.
In May 2008, a senior Indian Embassy
official in Beijing was called back to New Delhi for falling to the charms of a
Chinese honey trap. Manmohan Sharma, a senior Research and Analysis Wing (RAW)
officer, was alleged to be in a romantic affair with his Chinese language
teacher. Indian authorities suspected the woman could be an informant of the
Chinese government and gathered information about India's moves and
counter-moves on the border talks.
In October 2007, a 1975 batch Research and
Analysis Service (RAS) officer Ravi Nair was called back from Hong Kong for his
'friendship' with a girl believed to be working for a Chinese spy agency. However,
within a brief time Nair was again given a foreign posting in Colombo where the
woman also came and allegedly started staying with him, raising suspicion. The
officials of other departments, posted at the Indian High Commission, sent reports
about Nair to their respective departments paving way for his recall.
Like any other snooping agency, India's
external Intelligence agency RAW has also a history of officials switching
their loyalties to foreign agencies. The most infamous case which shook RAW out
of reverie was that of Rabinder Singh who became a mole of American
intelligence agency CIA and flew to the US despite being under RAW
surveillance. Singh initially worked with the Indian Army and held a very
senior position with RAW handling Southeast Asia. By the time the agency sensed
his affiliations, Singh escaped to the US through Nepal in 2004. There are
reports that he died in a road accident in USA sometime in 2016.
The second blow came in 2006 with the
discovery of another alleged CIA mole in India's National Security Council
Secretariat, which is part of the Prime Minister's Office. In the early 90s, an
Indian Naval attaché posted in Islamabad reportedly fell in love with a
Pakistani woman working in the Military Nursing Service in Karachi. The attaché
was interrogated and then forced to resign. Reports said the official, who had
initially claimed having recruited the woman as a spy, was being blackmailed by
the ISI, which wanted his services after his return to the Naval Headquarters
in Delhi.
Then a personal assistant to a very senior
RAW official disappeared in London in the early 90s. Ashok Sathe, another
official was also believed to have defected to the US after his mysterious
disappearance. Sathe was said to be behind burning down of RAW office in
Khurramshahr in Iran. In the early 1980s, a senior field officer disappeared in
London. As attaché in Kathmandu, he was alleged to be liaising with foreign
intelligence agencies.
In another case, a senior Intelligence
Bureau (IB) official, who was due to take over as the chief of
counter-intelligence, had an unauthorised relationship with a female US
consular officer. His meetings with her were recorded on camera by the IB, and
he was forced to retire following interrogation.
However, in the history of Indian
intelligence, the most written about case was that of K V Unnikrishnan, a RAW
officer dealing with the LTTE. He had developed a relationship with an air
hostess believed to be an intelligence scion. He was arrested just ahead of a
peace accord signed between India and Sri Lanka.
The oldest case of 'honey trapping', when
an Indian diplomat in 1950s was trapped by a Russian girl in Moscow. When the
Russian spy agency KGB presented him with the pictures of his activities with
the girl, the diplomat informed his ambassador about his relationship and the
KGB's attempts to blackmail him. The ambassador raised the issue with the
topmost level. The young diplomat was warned to be more careful in future.
The mysterious world of intelligence and
counter-intelligence has a different architecture in the times of advanced
technology, artificial intelligence and other very sophisticated methods. On a
multi-polar globe, India attracts a special intentness from the secret services
of various influential countries. The presence of very emphatic non-state actors
in the field of espionage is the real challenge with which India will have to
deal to keep its Foreign Service protected.
§
No comments:
Post a Comment